From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Aug 3 07:11:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE52DCDC69 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hlh@restart.be) Received: from tignes.restart.be (tignes.restart.be [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:bdbe:0:1::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tignes.restart.be", Issuer "CA master" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25D36A5B6 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hlh@restart.be) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=2001:41d0:8:bdbe:1:1::; helo=restart.be; envelope-from=hlh@restart.be; receiver=manu@bidouilliste.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 tignes.restart.be 3xNLnQ1xB4zsHQ DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=restart.be; s=tignes; t=1501744266; bh=ZQKoezfWbk+o9UwWmraXdlpgtNdDP5Vo0oqanXgndjg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20Pine64+=202GB=20and=20RPI3=20(A64=20examples):=2 0Any=20general=20idea=20on=0D=0A=20what/when=20to=20expect=20for=2 0the=20return=20of=20USB=20support=20to=20head?|To:=20Emmanuel=20V adot=20,=20Mark=20Millard=20|Cc:=20freebsd-arm=20|References:=2 0=0D=0A=20<2017 0802210607.dc92b751dcc23f3ddaea5144@bidouilliste.com>|From:=20Henr i=20Hennebert=20|Date:=20Thu,=203=20Aug=202017=200 9:11:03=20+0200|In-Reply-To:=20<20170802210607.dc92b751dcc23f3ddae a5144@bidouilliste.com>; b=BEwjJ2BcOdraD6+aJJxEGyyvmjBOef1i/tcoDL+ENTcbVRsC2tsr3bDWQK5Y9Agz1 dAaFznkdGF5ck09dpP4cuqtRRGYBqAQJOAxEb2VquqeIf5UdNsgDw4I8T6teyVdHwS BFZg2QUeTAt35OyfjUf5fDgLZBqXkn/2rzn/q5yDRvNtaysnOVftJAe+bpPUUXnZEc ES4NBkK7cbXZDUDYau+JYKLNfDgA7wfvxd8SMuz4l40qYNj8BwSulpp55PX3E/CRa5 LaTPkvLqyAnREiJoIBqkcIcFFgyM3reyHj5487p5gFuJSVNey+MS8G3JrWK9fZ6exJ V1H0XPkIV3j9A== Received: from restart.be (avoriaz.restart.be [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:bdbe:1:1::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.restart.be", Issuer "CA master" (verified OK)) by tignes.restart.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xNLnQ1xB4zsHQ; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from chamonix.restart.bel (chamonix.restart.bel [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:bdbe:1:9:0:0]) (authenticated bits=0) by restart.be (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v737B3LU011503 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:11:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hlh@restart.be) Subject: Re: Pine64+ 2GB and RPI3 (A64 examples): Any general idea on what/when to expect for the return of USB support to head? To: Emmanuel Vadot , Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm References: <20170802210607.dc92b751dcc23f3ddaea5144@bidouilliste.com> From: Henri Hennebert Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:11:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170802210607.dc92b751dcc23f3ddaea5144@bidouilliste.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr-classic Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:11:09 -0000 On 08/02/2017 21:06, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:03:23 -0700 > Mark Millard wrote: > >> [I historically use a ufs USB SSD for a (head) root file >> system on a Pine64+ 2GB and a RPI3. Thus the question >> below.] >> >> Context for question (note the "USB not working for now" >> in the Log Message): >> >>> Revision 320612 >>> >>> Author: >>> manu >>> Date: >>> Mon Jul 3 19:30:03 2017 UTC (4 weeks, 1 day ago) >>> Changed paths: >>> 5 >>> Log Message: >>> allwinner: Add A64 ccung support >>> >>> Upstream DTS for A64 SoC doesn't provide a /clocks node as Linux switched >>> to ccu-ng >>> This commit adds the necessary bits to boot on pine64 with latest DTS from >>> upstream. >>> USB is not working for now and some node aren't present in the DTS (like the >>> PMU, Power Management Unit). >>> >>> Tested on: Pine64 >>> >>> Changed paths >>> Path >>> Details >>> head/sys/arm/allwinner/a10_mmc.c >>> modified , text changed >>> head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/aw_ccung.c >>> modified , text changed >>> head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/ccu_a64.c >>> added >>> head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/ccu_a64.h >>> added >>> head/sys/conf/files.arm64 >>> modified , text changed >> >> /head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/ccu_a64.c shows an >> empty "USBPHY clk sel" section: >> >> 553 /* USBPHY clk sel */ >> 554 >> 555 /* DRAM needs update bit */ >> >> tending to confirm the log message. > > This is unrelated, this was a comment I've put during developement to > remind me to add the gate bits for usb. > I'll remove it. > >> >> The questions: >> >> Does anyone have a general idea that they can report for >> what/when to expect for the return of USB support for >> Pine64+ 2GB, RPI3, and the like A64 based contexts? > > I'm the only one who could have an idea (for Pine64) and I don't know. If it can help, I succeed at least one time to boot r321003 and have the APs released. Then it detect my usb hub and mount a root on zfs from my usb disk. For now, the APs not started is the only problem I encounter with PINE64+ I try r321776 but the APs not started is still present. Henri > >> Should I just ignore updating the Pine64+ 2GB and RPI3 for >> a few months more? (Because I do self-hosted builds on them >> I want the USB file system to be used for such activity.) > > You can do whatever you want, either ignore or help. >