From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  4 08:17:37 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6848D3E
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Apr 2014 08:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailstore06.sysedata.no (b.mail.tornado.no [195.159.29.130])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BCA3C7C
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Apr 2014 08:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [195.159.29.130] (helo=www.eposttjener.no)
 by mailstore06.sysedata.no with esmtpa (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>) id 1WVzJf-0004ML-1r
 for freebsd-pf@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:17:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:17:34 +0200
From: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: pf + NAT + ICMP =?UTF-8?Q?issues=3F?=
Message-ID: <29dcd4992e32b76281eb084a88d248ea@pyret.net>
X-Sender: daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
 \(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:17:37 -0000

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply, unfortunately I'm still experiencing the same 
issues but NAT seems to work at least for me as far as I can tell. I did 
upgrade to r263658 11.0-CURRENT but I'm still seeing the same issues. If 
there's no traction I'll file a pr regarding this as at least two are 
seeing the same issues.

Best regards,
Daniel