From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 18 13:15:39 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA16821 for current-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:15:39 -0700 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA16812 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:15:32 -0700 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA14739; Tue, 18 Apr 95 13:58:48 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9504181958.AA14739@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: fsck trashes / if no /lost+found? To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 18 Apr 95 13:58:48 MDT Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, fenner@parc.xerox.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199504181824.LAA01700@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Apr 18, 95 11:24:44 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [ ... lost+found not created by default ... ] > >Time to add the appropriate part to newfs(8)? > > I asked Kirk about this and he said "no". I might still have the email > around somewhere. I still think his arguments are only valid for the log structured FS. There is also the problem of archivers ignoring inode 3 the same way they ignore inode 1 (which used to be the free list). At the *very* least, inode 3 ought to be preallocated or unallocable. I'm sure you probably have my reply lurking around as well in case I brought it up at some future date. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.