From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 23:18:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9999737F for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412B3999 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D54320901; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:18:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E4C097.7040007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:19:51 +0100 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fixes for apr-util's FreeTDS driver References: <50E4A29D.4020204@aldan.algebra.com> <50E4B0D4.9090802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50E4B0D4.9090802@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Mikhail T." X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:18:59 -0000 > On 02.01.2013 17:12, Olli Hauer wrote: >> Hi Mikhail, >> >> patch applies clean on our current devel/apr1 port (apr-util-1.4.1). >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/patch-apr-util-1.4.1__dbd__apr_dbd_freetds.c >> >> Maybe the patch finds more notice upstream if shaped against the current apr-util-1.5.1? >> Do you have also a patch for apr-util-1.5.1 available? > I'm pretty sure, it will apply just as well against 1.5 -- the driver has not > changed in years. As currently shipped it is badly broken because the dbd/driver > API changed (years ago!) and the FreeTDS-driver only got updated to allow it to > /compile/ (but not /work/). You are right (just done a quick diff) > > The drag is in that very few people use Sybase with Apache -- the products are > from two different worlds, so to speak... My client happens to (still) use > Vignette for their web-publishing (and Vignette uses Sybase as its own backend), > so that's why they were interested -- but it is a rare case... Back in 2002/3 I was happy to shutdown a product which used Sybase (application crashed, connection not closed clean so lic. for next client not freed up ...) Maybe the user who send in the apr_pcalloc diff is also interested and can confirm your patch > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201207.mbox/%3C4994179EC7ED6843AAB0A30A1639E7F81DB5260901@DGEX2V.dg.deltagroup.com%3E >> I hope the FreeBSD ports infrastructure is full back in near time so an expr-run with >> the current apr-util can be done. > This would be new functionality so I doubt, an expr-run is warranted... >> Which FreeTDS port should be used as dependency ? I was thinking about apr-util-1.5.x, was not related to your patch more about the time frame for a commit. >> $> grep -i ^freetds /usr/ports/INDEX-8 | cut -d\| -f - >> freetds-0.64_8,1|/usr/ports/databases/freetds >> freetds-devel-0.91_3,1|/usr/ports/databases/freetds-devel >> freetds-msdblib-0.64_8,1|/usr/ports/databases/freetds-msdblib > I think, it should LIB_DEPEND on sybdb with the databases/freetds used by > default. If the system already has -lsybdb installed by any other port, then it > can use that. Ok, will do some test builds at the weekend on 8.3/9.1 (amd64). -- Regards, olli