From owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org  Thu Mar 23 21:12:01 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627AAD19486
 for <freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:12:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
 [128.95.76.21])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4942E1FF3
 for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:12:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v2NLBx1K026779
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2NLBxSt026778
 for freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from sgk)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:11:59 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bit twiddling question
Message-ID: <20170323211159.GA26726@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions."
 <freebsd-numerics.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-numerics>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:12:01 -0000

----- Forwarded message from Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> -----
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:52:25 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
Cc: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bit twiddling question
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:46:34PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:

(A large chuck removed)

> 
> C11 doesn't have sincos*() or sind*() to make us more incomplete.
> 

I've had a sincos*() implementation for a few years now.  
You've seen it, and were dissatisfied with it because I
combined sin[fl] and cos[fl] kernels into sincos[kl] kernels. 

(deleted)

----- End forwarded message -----

Whoops.  Didn't mean to broadcast this to freebsd-numerics
lists as no Copyright statement is attached to code.  Oh well.

-- 
Steve
20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow