From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 19:12:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CCD1065676 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7178FC1F for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:12:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m62JCXte002935; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:12:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m62JCX8v002932; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:12:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:12:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chad Perrin In-Reply-To: <20080702184345.GC4709@kokopelli.hydra> Message-ID: <20080702211133.Y2931@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <539c60b90806301348l4b09cd90n3972b41339276d6f@mail.gmail.com> <20080702143434.J9414@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080702184345.GC4709@kokopelli.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: OT: anyone been crazy enough to mirror wikipedia? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:12:58 -0000 >> >> wikipedia is just a pile of junk. everyone can put in it, and >> unfortunately do. > > Meanwhile, in print encyclopedias, I see that with restricted writing > access and strict editing processes there are typically systemic biases > and subtler mistakes that are much easier to overlook -- and the mistakes > not only persist until the next edition, but often exist for decades, > whereas finding a mistake in Wikipedia is fixable within five minutes. and 3 others are added. > The key is that an encyclopedia should never be the *end* of your > research. It's basically just a place to look for key terms to research actually what i do - to get the first glance on subject, THEN checking more precisely. but quite often it's crap even at the first glance