From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Sep 8 23:50:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B00515126 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:50:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id XAA72230; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909090650.XAA72230@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Subject: Re: docs/7456 Reply-To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/7456; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Jim Mock Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Gnats Subject: Re: docs/7456 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 08:18:20 +0200 * Jim Mock (jim@blues.ghis.net) [990909 07:15]: > On Wed, 08 Sep 1999 at 23:12:21 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 09:45:36PM +1000, Jim Mock wrote: > > > Can this be closed now? > > > > Pass. Does the new version of libdialog that's been imported since > > the PR fix the problem? > > > > I'd be slightly happier if someone actually stood up and said the > > problem has gone away though. *stands up* "It's still there." "Fix at 21:00 my local time." > Agreed. I'll hold off on closing it in hopes Stefan lets us know one > way or the other. Stefan? No need for Stefan to be contacted. I just verified, it's still bogus. I'll fix it tonight, unless chris beats me to it =). -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai asmodai(at)wxs.nl The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project Network/Security Specialist BSD: Technical excellence at its best Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message