From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 16:15:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689CB16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:15:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1723B43D41 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:15:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbrier@multideck.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-98-143-250.atl.client2.attbi.com[24.98.143.250]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <200409081615320130054b9le>; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:15:32 +0000 Message-ID: <413F305C.4030007@multideck.com> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:16:28 -0400 From: "Frederick N. Brier" Organization: Multideck Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Multiple IP addresses in a Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:15:33 -0000 Perhaps there is another way to do this, but I am trying to layout as fault tolerant a network architecture as possible. Most rack mounted boxes come with at least 2 Ethernet ports for what one would assume is to have each go to a separate switch (or to act as a firewall). If either switch goes Tango Uniform, the network is still up. But if my processes are running in Jails and I create an IP alias for each network interface for the jail, I need to specify 2 IP addresses for the Jail, not one. I had heard there was a patch to do this and that it had been added to FreeBSD 5.3. Is this not the case? Is there a patch? Is there another way to do this? Thank you. Frederick N. Brier Multideck Corporation