From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Dec  7 10:21:27 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA03290
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id KAA03283
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:21:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <16764(2)>; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:20:47 PST
Received: by crevenia.parc.xerox.com id <177711>; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:20:41 -0800
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com, imb@scgt.oz.au
Subject: Re: MROUTING & gated
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, tom@sdf.com
Message-Id: <96Dec7.102041pst.177711@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:20:41 PST
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Sorry, I don't know nuthin' 'bout OSPF (I think it might be a unicast
routing protocol =).  I do know about multicast, though, and I know
that 224.0.0.x will not be forwarded.  If there are OSPF exchanges that
should be forwarded by a multicast router, then they shouldn't use a
224.0.0.x group.

  Bill