From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Feb  2  7:40: 6 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A3D37B400
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Feb 2002 07:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g12Fe2175061;
	Sat, 2 Feb 2002 07:40:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 07:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200202021540.g12Fe2175061@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: "Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev" <timon@memphis.mephi.ru>
Subject: Re: bin/34483: wrong execv() call in amd for ${mount} and ${unmount} if mount type:=program in amd.map
Reply-To: "Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev" <timon@memphis.mephi.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/34483; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev" <timon@memphis.mephi.ru>
To: roam@ringlet.net, timon@memphis.mephi.ru
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/34483: wrong execv() call in amd for ${mount} and ${unmount} if mount type:=program in amd.map
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 18:36:55 +0300 (MSK)

 > From roam@straylight.ringlet.net Sat Feb  2 18:21:17 2002
 > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 17:00:18 +0200
 > From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
 > To: "Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev" <timon@memphis.mephi.ru>
 > Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
 > Subject: Re: bin/34483: wrong execv() call in amd for ${mount} and ${unmount} if mount type:=program in amd.map
 >
 > Actually, I now believe Erez to be correct - I no longer think this is a bug.
 > What he is trying to say is that you should provide argv[0] along with
 > the other arguments, *after* the path to the program.  This allows you
 > to execute a program, giving it an argv[0] different from the filename
 > of the executable file - exactly the same way that inetd.conf's syntax
 > allows you to do the same.  This is done to minimize the need for
 > hardlinks, as you say; even without a hardlink, you are able to invoke,
 > say, /sbin/mount as either 'mount' or 'mount_ffs' or 'mount_msdosfs' or
 > whatever else you like.
 Yeah, I found description of this in _info am-utils_... So this pr should be closed, or
 something
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message