Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:24:12 +0100 (CET) From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: ports/34909: Porters Handbook or portlint problem Message-ID: <20020213162412.A983F216F@a96180.upc-a.chello.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 34909
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: Porters Handbook or portlint problem
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-ports
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed Feb 13 08:30:02 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
>Release: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
Ninth Circle
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD daemon.chronias.ninth-circle.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Sat Nov 24 17:08:51 CET 2001 asmodai@celestial.chronias.ninth-circle.org:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/DAEMON i386
>Description:
The Porters Handbook, part 4.10 lists a dependency on ${PREFIX}, while
a portlint check says people should use ${LOCALBASE} or ${X11BASE}
instead.
>How-To-Repeat:
Have a port with a dependency which contains ${PREFIX} and unleash
portlint -abcvtN on it.
>Fix:
Not sure. Either the documenation is faulty, or portlint is outdated.
Hence submitted to ports at first, but can/needs to be reassigned to
docs if it is a documenation error.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020213162412.A983F216F>