From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 15 14:20:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D635F37B401; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic.adaptec.com [208.236.45.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5556443E75; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:20:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@btc.adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAFMKIj17014; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com (btc.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.0.52]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA27590; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:20:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from hollin.btc.adaptec.com (hollin [10.100.253.56]) by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA04922; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:20:10 -0700 (MST) Received: from hollin.btc.adaptec.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hollin.btc.adaptec.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAFMGXfw011670; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:16:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@hollin.btc.adaptec.com) Received: (from scottl@localhost) by hollin.btc.adaptec.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id gAFMGXZB011669; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:16:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:16:33 -0700 From: Scott Long To: John Baldwin Cc: Nate Lawson , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: alpha tinderbox failure Message-ID: <20021115221632.GB11650@hollin.btc.adaptec.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:43:16PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 15-Nov-2002 Nate Lawson wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> He means 'nowerror' in sys/conf/files > > > > Since this doesn't generate errors on i386, would it be counterproductive > > to put it in the global files? > > Yes. Hence it has not been done. > > >> FWIW, the correct patch would be to use %j and uintmax_t, not longs. > > > > I believe this was not done due to Linux compat issues but I'm not sure. > > C99 is a bit recent I guess. We just started supporting it ourselves. > Guys, We understand this problem and apologize for not addressing it yet. As many of you know, we are coming off of a highly compressed and stressful developemnt cycle and just haven't had the time to push out fixes for this and many other things. Our plan is to address these driver next week. If you can't wait until then, just go ahead and disconnect the drivers from the alpha tinderbox and move on. As was pointed out though, this is only the tip of the iceberg of warnings in /sys/dev. Scott > -- > > John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message