From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 12:07:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB36106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4781D8FC0C for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so11452322pbb.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 05:07:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mE1psBUzotlvLXmgBErFkufQYKx211wvXR3b8EMeDoI=; b=gT1HucwWe7gMvIQ5VEwkRF3YTZBSjQfZWaAzB0+r9tkVuydO7xxVrqJA65CEeVdzPq bPZEJftjLwCxtdQM0T9zzAU3orjqfIM3MwTZCbFWx5tXvQ0ztBelscQVuG1E5Io+ZdWv hnI2idXzCVKfkgFLuluxjHGcONVzuYEaZbPyCvhm7Q2gMLO56D2avlGnHnjI8zmc4TcW 49kjwbEixs0XN+zapoGPBRO7nbTcpytCgEd91WdCkSf1xVFOBNtIPnT3IMk4LFeJaL/B fII4f8otc1Z75p3ETcx6fPeEsVAE7bCBrmuY9KGTunTD4TU2hWrZkh5OeN1swFEkyne1 rz0w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.238.166 with SMTP id vl6mr11819998pbc.96.1343045233674; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 05:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.191.138 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 05:07:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 05:07:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Kim Culhan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multi vap Multi-SSID with ath on FreeBSD 10-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:07:14 -0000 On 23 July 2012 05:06, Kim Culhan wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I'm knee deep in massaging the driver to be ready for the AR93xx and >> later series chips. > > Would an ar9380 be good for testing when you get the driver to that point? yup. adrian