Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:11:31 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: In-kernel API for tasks, which could wait? Message-ID: <435960310.20111030191131@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20111030150339.GP50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <43470728.20111030185451@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20111030150339.GP50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Kostik. You wrote 30 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 19:03:39: > See taskqueue(9). On the other hand, waiting for the enqueued task to > finish is itself the sleepable action. I'll not wait for finishing. Task will put result to volatile atomic field, and it's all.=20 --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?435960310.20111030191131>