From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Feb  6 05:24:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA02798
          for isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 05:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.intercenter.net ([207.211.128.20])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA02788
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 05:24:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20818 invoked from network); 6 Feb 1997 13:24:40 -0000
Received: from bigboy.intercenter.net (207.211.128.17)
  by mir.intercenter.net with SMTP; 6 Feb 1997 13:24:40 -0000
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 08:24:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net>
To: Intuitive Design Info <info@in-design.com>
cc: isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: senmail vs. qmail
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205232546.6612A-100000@nero.in-design.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970206082251.9203A-100000@bigboy.intercenter.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Intuitive Design Info wrote:

> > I've been running qmail on FreeBSD and BSDI for many months now and have
> > had zero stability problems.
> > 
> > I'm using the qmsmac package for virtual domain email and once you get use
> > to the differences (and they are significant) qmail is a piece of cake to
> > maintain.
>
> 	I looked on cdrom, and I couldn't find either package.  Could you 
> give me a location where I could find both by any chance.

Both are available at ftp.qmail.org/pub/software

Ron