From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 13 17:30:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from pioneernet.net (mail.pioneernet.net [207.115.64.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A577B37B403 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:30:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chip@wiegand.org) Received: from wiegand.org [66.114.152.128] by pioneernet.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.05) id A863277D0100; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:42:11 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2806A8.10FE02CA@wiegand.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:34:49 -0700 From: Chip X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD User Group Tips References: <20010613120321.A92103@superhero.org> <3B27A7AF.C5041142@acuson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Johnson wrote: > Erich Zigler wrote: > > > > Hello, > > I'm currently contemplating starting a BSD User's Group in my local area > > seeing how there is not one already. > > If you can find some old Linux Journal magazines, a few years ago there > was an article about starting up a LUG. There shouldn't be any > difference at all with starting up a BUG, except that the acronym for > the Seattle Linux User's Group is more disgusting than the acronym for > the BSD User's Group of Greater Yakima... > > David :-) Compared to that, SeaFUG ain't so bad after all. (The fug has talked a bit about changing the name, but it hasn't gone anywhere.) -- Chip (Proud member of the SeaFUG) :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message