From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 29 5: 2: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2DA37B402; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:01:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA07884; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:01:42 -0800 Message-ID: <3C569D35.8060805@owt.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:01:41 -0800 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Suetterlin Cc: "Crist J. Clark" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why? /sys//include /usr/include/sys out of sync. References: <20020129110222.GE9904@robert2.mpe-garching.mpg.de> <3C568668.6090606@owt.com> <20020129115108.GF9904@robert2.mpe-garching.mpg.de> <3C568DC0.9080800@owt.com> <20020129041734.L30530@blossom.cjclark.org> <3C569835.2040201@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Crist J. Clark wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:55:44AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: >> >>> >>> Robert Suetterlin wrote: >>> >>> >>>> What I do is the following procedure: >>>> >>>> make update >>>> make world >>>> mergemaster >>>> make buildkernel >>>> make installkernel >>>> reboot >>>> >>>> >>> >>> That isn't the suggested procedure in /usr/src/UPDATING. They have >>> you do the buildworld first and the installworld and mergemaster >>> after your installkernel and boot to single user mode. >>> >> >> It's a dangerous way to go (running an old kernel with a new world), >> but if this is the path he followed, his "include" files should be up >> to date. > > > > I kind of wonder if he cvsuped src-all. With the exception of some > options in make.conf or refuses, I can't imagine anything else that > would cause problems like that. It has been so long since I had a version of cvsup with the 9 Sep 2001 bug in it. I kind of wonder what that would do in a situation like this. A "cvsup -v" would be interestesting. Especially if it wasn't 16.1d or better. -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message