From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 15:12:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E747F106566C for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A205C8FC22 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NrYR9-00057g-Gb for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:12:03 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:12:03 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:12:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:11:52 +0100 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100118 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Choosing CPU for router X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:12:20 -0000 On 03/16/10 13:40, Jon Otterholm wrote: > Hi. > > In the process to build a new router and want to choose the best possible > CPU for the job. > > Narrowed it down to the following: > > Intel Q9650 3,0Ghz > Intel i7-965/975 3,2Ghz/3,33Ghz Both are overkill, but in general here you should go for clock speed instead of multicore abilities. If you can get it, you will be better off with a 3.5 GHz dual-core CPU (like Xeon 52xx) than a 3 GHz quad-core CPU. Additional cores will not be used by network processing in your case. Better invest the money in a good network card. > What would be the benefit from a Xeon? Stability, but that also comes from using better motherboards, ECC memory, etc, not only from the CPU.