From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 15:38:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DCD3C7 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nukama@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f50.google.com (mail-bk0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA8A1BA for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id jf3so7756760bkc.37 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:38:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ttNRYAhWyp7Pdefz0olMjJNKXA36IOHQ6ePDJdQEjF0=; b=E8GI8aLjFnJnTR4f+i64TAUEFMZUKLVbsAAXnnBRjRpzCmBGcMvUJPCeVsPdhUBg+W lZQFT/fNz1C0IYDqvsx6zkfaYeDrrI+i3oRu2/P/5CAwDO0PGd++D3cbYpN3ICStg7VL njsYa/AEM1xK5blxatNsVolwBh/2kerSsVJtTplsM/9nNuP/UUtWyh5aUbCjJ3Pc7W8P ZZBYSxRzykoJdNwfDFnfmD2yIfVF5vF8dQq4VZTbXVVGbRqZ/lXP6HOVe2b6bqUIc/d+ bmzFVXGDHDMfSwawusMRnwR4TGiY092GN0iwmjbFlWzkf6ivuzLJlLKo9y20wjNyuppL NHWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.147.25 with SMTP id j25mr27103787bkv.36.1357400302113; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.237.10 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:38:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:38:21 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: L1 cache thrashing affects performance of HIMENO benchmark From: Hakisho Nukama To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:44:08 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:38:24 -0000 Hi, FreeBSD (PCBSD) is slower compared to Linux and kFreeBSD in this benchmark of HIMENO: http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1202215-BY-FREEBSD9683/88ac7a01c6cb355d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d Also DragonFly BSD compares worse to kFreeBSD and Linux: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=dragonfly_linux_32&num=3 http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1206255-SU-DRAGONFLY55/88ac7a01c6cb355d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d Matt, Venkatesh and Alex investigated this performance problem and came to these results: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2013-01/msg00011.html Best Regards, Hakisho Nukama