From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 28 21:00:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27288106566B; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CC78FC18; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so3110894qyk.13 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r7nZFrHyv3aKtFvOYznoNFZlmVNcEYGAIxlSF4e3wvI=; b=e46xVr/6yzQd/pqKY+6i/F9FjuszRp7NUWOKtlFX8VwAQ6L/K0ViriwFGBYCObUWb2 VTyFJamJWEhBsmZqPPWO94UtSFS0tCrSG1/JFtXeQfZQWJpHvHFjc4wp8jrsdRCE/rYA aNQQxVkrwk1H/nBaHz7TQS03MLGJLHOGew4Gc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.216.197 with SMTP id hj5mr7866418qab.24.1317243611754; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.74.82 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201109281245.40015.beech@freebsd.org> References: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> <4E8377F1.7020906@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E838127.5090601@FreeBSD.org> <201109281245.40015.beech@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:00:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Beech Rintoul Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Matt , Doug Barton , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, aakuusta@gmail.com, "Hartmann, O." Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:00:14 -0000 On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote: >> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> > The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG >> > compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas. >> > Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they >> > got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation report from >> > portmaster. But the libiconv.so.3 wasn't there anymore when I checked! >> > >> > This is a catastrophy ... >> > >> > I'm on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r225844 >> >> It's been widely reported on the ports list that you can't do fresh >> ports compiles on 10-current, and won't be able to until well after >> 9.0-RELEASE. The primary reason is that auto* stuff doesn't understand >> the 2-digit release version. >> >> Solutions are to set UNAME_r=9.0-CURRENT in your environment, and/or >> twiddle the version in newvers.sh and rebuild/reinstall your kernel. >> >> >> hth, >> >> Doug > > So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm not > going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to > avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to > build packages on my tindy and force install. Today no, but when someone in changes something in base or ports that checks for __FreeBSD_version, yes. HTH, -Garrett