From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 21 10:02:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02848106566C for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8268FC1B for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [88.130.201.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBFB8A16C1; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:02:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B81049A.8060400@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:02:02 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christer Solskogen References: <4B80EAD4.1070109@bsdforen.de> <4B81006D.2000906@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package-noinstall does not include rc.d scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:02:06 -0000 On 21/02/2010 10:47, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >> So the right solution might be for the "package-noinstall" target to >> use "pkg_create -b" and additionally create the symlinks. >> >> I do not like have different code for doing the same thing in this >> context. >> > > Does the target 'package' use pkg_create? Yes it does. I have a patch that should do the trick. Would you be so kind to test it? http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado0001/patch-ports-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt If it does, please open a PR and post the number here. wxs and I can post our patches there and portmgr can decide. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?