From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 8 22:47:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8D616A400; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 22:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwmalone@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD22743D45; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 22:47:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwmalone@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (dwmalone@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k38Mlq4U033393; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 22:47:52 GMT (envelope-from dwmalone@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from dwmalone@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k38Mlq8F033389; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 22:47:52 GMT (envelope-from dwmalone) Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 22:47:52 GMT From: David Malone Message-Id: <200604082247.k38Mlq8F033389@freefall.freebsd.org> To: dwmalone@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, dwmalone@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/95290: [patch] on amd64, inetd(8) returns 8 byte time value instead of 4 byte X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 22:47:53 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] on amd64, inetd(8) returns 8 byte time value instead of 4 byte Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->dwmalone Responsible-Changed-By: dwmalone Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 8 22:46:25 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take a look at this - I want to see if there are other types that might match the protocol more closely before committing the patch. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=95290