From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 2 11:20:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFFC106566B; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FCC8FC19; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from User-PC (unknown [81.181.146.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E543222C5560; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:20:57 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:20:51 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: utisoft@gmail.com Message-Id: <20110502142051.7d3284f5.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <4DBD0C24.4040305@FreeBSD.org> <4DBE7373.2020808@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: itetcu@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree Subject: Re: expiration of net/skype ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:20:59 -0000 On Mon, 2 May 2011 12:14:37 +0100 Chris Rees wrote: > On 2 May 2011 10:03, Matthias Andree wrote: > > Am 02.05.2011 10:49, schrieb Chris Rees: > > > >>> or otherwise issue a hint > >>> that the port is kept for the benefit of those who happen to have a > >>> distfile. > >> > >> Which is what, thirty people? > > > > I don't care. Let's not deliberately break the port for those who can > > still use it. > > > > Please remove the EXPIRATION_DATE; I'm also willing to "maintain" the > > port if needed. > > > > Although the port is already broken (no-one is deliberately breaking it), there > is a possible (temporary) solution for those who want to use their own distfile. > > ITetcu, miwi, please would you have a look at [1]? It's partly lifted > from the diablo > ports; just makes it more convenient if one has the distfile already, > as well as using > IGNORE rather than BROKEN; we know it won't ever build. > > Chris > > [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/skype-distfile.diff Looks good; I was convinced something like this was already committed. -- Ion-Mihai Tetcu