From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 18:39:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5CF16A4CE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:39:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F6D43D69 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:39:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan.cojocar@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so633537wra for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:39:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=eL9fqSpIEqCsFxxTA1fYCX2JP2/GStuvowSyxP6sVdngJK3+OdAriy4XtYfo4+2URc6GwJ/WKQHqqeGU3z0F/2AqrTRpAVqilF6+HnM8QtRbHLP8PrzmMa4kEZyqF3MGNhW7LBHs8t+5aWQv0p3qBSbDt3kFQnJ9VjSEegCgZww= Received: by 10.54.52.42 with SMTP id z42mr1023849wrz; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:38:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.26.4 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:38:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:38:57 +0300 From: Dan Cojocar To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <424C41C3.50705@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050329143237.02f15990@64.7.153.2> <20050329154013.B52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330104117.A52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330123458.T52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <424C41C3.50705@root.org> cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: Interrupt storm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan Cojocar List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:39:03 -0000 On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog > >>>> timeout, no interrupt storms: > >>> > >>> --- 8< --- --- 8< --- > >>> > >>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic > >>>> I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but > >>>> i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC. > >>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic > >>>> And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's > >>>> running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i > >>>> don't have acpi :(, here is the final > >>>> dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi. > >>> > >>> > >>> It looks like your motherboard's DSDT is doing something hokey. I would > >>> complain to the board manufacturer about this. For the timebeing, you > >>> can > >>> dump the DSDT into ASL format, modify it, compile it back to DSDT and > >>> load > >>> a proper version on system startup. If this is your first time, you > >>> probably want to run "acpidump -d > my.asl" and make the resulting file > >>> available somewhere. > >>> > >>> Would you also mind sharing the kernel config file that was used to > >>> build > >>> the kernel that gaves you the mother of all interrupt parties? > >>> > >> Here is my asl: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/my.asl > >> And here is my kernel config: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/FREE > > Is this on 5.x? There's a quirk for a broken APIC override for the > timer interrupt for NVIDIA chipsets but I don't think it's been MFCd yet. > Hello Nate, That was on -current, from Tue Mar 29 21:00:00 EEST 2005, but i have now a current from today and i get the same storm. Thanks, Dan