From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 29 14:52:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA12969 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ppp7258.on.sympatico.ca (ppp7241.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.249.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA12948 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by ppp7258.on.sympatico.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA00398; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 17:51:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 17:51:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: hoek@hwcn.org cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , jgrosch@superior.mooseriver.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Uh oh.. Time to take another look at the packages collection! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 29 Sep 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > You could make 2 package CDs. The packages which are dependencies > (ie. they are depended on by some other package) would go on both > CDs, and the other packages depending on dependencies would go on would be split > both discs. This is a little wasteful, though... between both discs.