From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 1 11:48:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5061F16A4DF; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: from imap.multamedio.de (imap.multamedio.de [62.52.48.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD87443D45; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:48:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: by imap.multamedio.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 4039B882F7; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:47:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.multamedio.de (smtp.multamedio.de [62.52.48.116]) by imap.multamedio.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78128BA2 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:47:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by smtp.multamedio.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642D1B48D for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:38:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2101F92DCD; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:37:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC13F16A54A; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED9316A4DF; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from regnauld@catpipe.net) Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8553B43D46; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:45:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from regnauld@catpipe.net) Received: from localhost (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130]) by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8216343B7; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([195.249.214.130]) by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19674-08; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:45:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vinyl.catpipe.net (vinyl.catpipe.net [195.249.214.189]) by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B922163439E; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:45:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vinyl.catpipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1006) id 768F378C31; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:40:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:40:53 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld To: Josef Karthauser , Chris , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060801084053.GE22731@catpipe.net> References: <20060628103238.GA815@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060628103949.GJ2005@catpipe.net> <3aaaa3a0606281940k63c77ebfga84a854b2cd4ed84@mail.gmail.com> <20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE i386 Organization: catpipe Systems ApS User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at catpipe.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:37:29 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on imap.multamedio.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500000, version=1.0.2 Cc: Subject: Re: Can I pursuade someone to commit this patch? (Re: Multiple IP addresses in a jail.) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:48:14 -0000 Josef Karthauser (joe) writes: > Dear current folk, I'm forwarding this thread from the -net list where I > asked the question, is it possible to have more than one IP address in a > jail? The answer is yes, with Pawel's patch. The question here is can > I pursuade anyone to commit this to head and MFC it please? The > motivation is simple. I need to run a second SSL web server inside of a > jail, however that needs another IP address because SSL is incompatible > with HTTP/1.1. We have been using these patches all the way back since 5-CURRENT and they work very stable for us. I seem to remember that there were some reservations about the way it was being done, but for that matter it wouldn't be the first hack in jail (like u_int32_t for the ip_number in struct jail :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"