From owner-freebsd-mobile  Tue Jan 20 17:12:32 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA25210
          for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:12:32 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from jli.com (jli.com [199.2.111.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA25188
          for <mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:12:18 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from uucp@jli.com)
Received: by jli.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
	id m0xuoWR-0002WOC; Tue, 20 Jan 98 17:00 PST
Message-Id: <m0xuoWR-0002WOC@jli.com>
Received: (qmail 465 invoked from network); 21 Jan 1998 00:54:27 -0000
Received: from softdnserror (127.0.0.1)
  by softdnserror with SMTP; 21 Jan 1998 00:54:27 -0000
To: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: problems with SVEC NE2000 clone 
References: <199801210035.JAA17564@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> 
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 21 Jan 1998 09:35:01 +0900.
             <199801210035.JAA17564@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <452.885344036.1@cloud.rain.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 16:53:56 -0800
From: Bill Trost <trost@cloud.rain.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

HOSOKAWA Tatsumi writes:
    In article <m0xuo2I-0002WOC@jli.com>
    trost@cloud.rain.com writes:
    
    >> card "PMX   " "PE-200"
    >> 	config 0x1b "ed0" 10
    config 0x1 "ed0"

No joy, even with the irq present.  It was one that I had tried.  It seems like
0x1 "should" be the right config entry.  I don't understand....

    >> 	ether	0xff0
    ether 0x7f0

Why did you recommend this?  It doesn't seem to make any difference, but I was
wondering why you suggested the change.

Thanks for the suggestions.