From owner-cvs-all Thu Jun 21 17:41:26 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D6C37B409; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:41:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from iedowse@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5M0fLd62076; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:41:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from iedowse) Message-Id: <200106220041.f5M0fLd62076@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Ian Dowse Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:41:21 -0700 (PDT) To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount_nfs mount_nfs.8 X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG iedowse 2001/06/21 17:41:21 PDT Modified files: sbin/mount_nfs mount_nfs.8 Log: Make it much more obvious that the use of NQNFS is discouraged (the NQNFS code is ancient, bug-ridden, and should probably be removed). The wording here was very confusing; it was easy to get the impression that NQNFS is an extension to NFSv3 when in fact it just uses some NFSv3-like extensions on top of NFSv2. As witnessed by the mailing lists and PRs, some people were reading the description and deciding that NQNFS was what they wanted to use. MFC after: 1 week Revision Changes Path 1.24 +7 -10 src/sbin/mount_nfs/mount_nfs.8 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message