From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 18 16:48:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA18458 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 16:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA18449 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 16:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id BAA07130; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:48:20 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:48:20 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199709182348.BAA07130@bitbox.follo.net> From: Eivind Eklund To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" CC: md6tommy@mdstud.chalmers.se, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of Wed, 17 Sep 1997 08:41:32 -0700 Subject: Re: CDROM image References: <20322.874510892@time.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > You mean they make it available for FTP? > > Sure, I could do that easily, I've just never knew that anyone would > really _want_ a 640MB file to download. What do other folks think? Well, for me it would probably change from doing FTP installs to using CDs. I'm just to impatient to wait for a CD from Walnut Creek before installing machines, and just go with FTP installs each time. Burning a CD locally would be a snap if I just had the image available. Eivind, who thought that WC wouldn't want people to be able to burn their own CDs that easily.