From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 12:09:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A2037B404; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from baraca.united.net.ua (vlan1.baraca.united.net.ua [195.234.212.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0731343F93; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:09:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from max@vega.com) Received: from vega.vega.com (root@xDSL-2-2.united.net.ua [193.111.9.226]) h3EJ93TF008511; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:09:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from max@vega.com) Received: from vega.vega.com (max@localhost.vega.com [127.0.0.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3EJ9FPG023860; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:09:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from max@localhost) by vega.vega.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h3EJ9CM2023859; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:09:12 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:09:11 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev To: marcus@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030414190911.GA23799@vega.vega.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE i386 cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Mozilla shouldn't force -O2 optimisation on user X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:09:13 -0000 Hi, I think that every concept of "WITHOUT_OPTIMIZE" added in rev.1.136 of ports/www/mozilla/Makefile is wrong. No port should force optimisation level on user - we have CFLAGS for this and each user should be able to select any performance/stability ratio he wants. IMO relevant part of 1.136 should be backed out, or possibly turned into WITH_OPTIMIZED instead. Thanks! -Maxim