From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 23 11:40:48 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612E137B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B5743F93
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kirk@strauser.com)
Received: from pooh.honeypot.net.strauser.com (kirk@pooh.honeypot.net
	[10.0.5.128])
	by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6NIekFl069275
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:46 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from kirk@strauser.com)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <8AE4DA75-BCC1-11D7-9DA1-000A957FF666@pacbell.net>
	<87d6g1zwt7.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
	<1058980661.3981.0.camel@jupiter.main.gaddis.org>
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1058980661.3981.0.camel@jupiter.main.gaddis.org> (Jeremy
 Gaddis's message of "23 Jul 2003 12:17:41 -0500")
Message-ID: <87n0f5xf0x.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Subject: Re: BIND 9
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:40:48 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 2003-07-23T17:17:41Z, Jeremy Gaddis <jeremy@gaddis.org> writes:

> No, it's generally considered {easier,better,more manageable,...} to only
> have one instance of BIND.  BIND can be master for some domains and slave
> for others, so there really is no need.

I agree completely.  That question was pointed at the OP; I was trying to
see if there was something they were trying to accomplish that was out of
the ordinary.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/Htau5sRg+Y0CpvERAmDQAKCH4jDXbPXo2CkH+WEakK9UsSBnOgCZAXTk
Z3vPjBE22iZJQWzd8dBXA/w=
=gJKc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--