Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:50:41 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: audit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: du(1) -I option to ignore files/dirs Message-ID: <20010504095041.C13382@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20010430174649.mheffner@vt.edu>; from mheffner@vt.edu on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:46:49PM -0400 References: <20010428194259.J415@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <XFMail.20010430174649.mheffner@vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
..and a resounding silence on the list..
Does this mean that I can go ahead and commit the patch, with an
Approved by: mikeh & silence on -audit? :)
Guess not :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
I am the meaning of this sentence.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:46:49PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote:
>
> On 28-Apr-2001 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | And just when -arch thought they'd gotten rid of me and my du(1) patches.. ;)
> |
> | Well, since no one had any real objections to adding the -I flag, other than
> | 'no one else is doing that' (so why can't we?), and as several people agreed
> | that there was no easy (or moderately hard) way to do this with other utils,
> | here's an updated patch that properly uses slist's instead of the constant-
> | sized arrays in the previous version.
>
> Looks good
>
> |
> | +
> | +int
> | +ignorep(ent)
> | + FTSENT *ent;
> | +{
> | + struct ignentry *ign;
> | +
> | + if (SLIST_EMPTY(&ignores))
> | + return 0;
>
> This isn't needed though because it's caught in the _FOREACH.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010504095041.C13382>