Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 19:44:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990730194407.20420V-100000@cygnus.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <199907302342.RAA85088@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907301619280.6951-100000@janus.syracuse.net> "Brian F. Feldman" writes: > : And how about having > : if (securelevel > 3) > : return (EPERM); > : in bpf_open()? > > There are no security levels > 3. I'd be happy with > 0. This is > consistant with the meaning of "raw devices". What about the one-way sysctls that have been suggested? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990730194407.20420V-100000>