From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Oct 26 18:30: 0 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 97AF637B479; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from kris@localhost)
	by citusc17.usc.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) id e9R1W8K71640;
	Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kris)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:32:07 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@citusc.usc.edu>
To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Carlos A M dos Santos <casantos@cpmet.ufpel.tche.br>,
	kris@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG,
	taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp
Subject: Re: Making XFree86-4 the default
Message-ID: <20001026183207.A71629@citusc17.usc.edu>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010241252140.377-100000@gate.cpmet.ufpel.tche.br> <vqcvgugkkee.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <vqcvgugkkee.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:43:21AM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:43:21AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:

> Are there any other outstanding issues re throwing the big switch and
> making XFree86-4 the default now?  (As it says in the subject
> line...you guys thought I replied to an old mail by mistake? :)

Does the PAM stuff actually work? I thought I heard someone say that
it doesnt actually do anything.

Do we depend on the xwrapper by default yet, and not install the
servers setuid root?

Those are the outstanding things on my list.

Kris


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message