From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 3 10:43:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD2316A407; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FD243D49; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:43:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA3AhFP2033805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 05:43:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 05:43:09 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-Id: <20061103054309.3074eb94.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <454AB4ED.4090109@freebsd.org> References: <454A9A72.4050005@freebsd.org> <20061102214151.273c4ef8.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <454AB4ED.4090109@freebsd.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: trhodes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Install docs oddity X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:43:17 -0000 On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:18:05 -0800 "Bruce A. Mah" wrote: > If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > I can't find a patch in this email. :( > > > > But I do think a lot of our build needs re-written, the problem > > is where to start and what do we want to accomplish. > > Urk...did I forget that? Let's try that again, sorry about that. It happens my friend. > > The change is pretty simple...I just removed _SUBDIRUSE from the > dependency line of realinstall. It's not clear to me if there are any > other ramifications of this change however. :-p A quick look I gave, nothing bad in sight ... I reserve the right to be wrong. > > I kind of wish I remembered more about how this stuff worked...I haven't > seriously looked at this in like three or four years. I'm surprised that we haven't noticed this sooner ... -- Tom Rhodes