Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Jul 2012 22:25:25 +0200
From:      Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
Message-ID:  <4FF9ECB5.5090507@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012.07.08. 1:17, Doug Barton wrote:
> Other than authoritative DNS, what features does unbound lack that you want?
[Picking up a random mail from the thread.]

Other than the functionality, when we replace something, it is also 
important to do some benchmarks and assure that the performance is not 
reasonably worse. Some time back I committed the error of not carefully 
pass this requirement with BSD grep but so far it seems it went fine 
with the recent BSD sort change. It would be nice to also ensure this 
with the unbound change if it really happens.

Gabor



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FF9ECB5.5090507>