From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr  2  6:58:23 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F1BA737B41A; Tue,  2 Apr 2002 06:58:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from alane@localhost)
	by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g32ExI479425;
	Tue, 2 Apr 2002 09:59:18 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from alane)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 09:59:18 -0500
From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Alan Eldridge <ports@geeksrus.net>
Subject: Re: ports/36589: www/pyweblib: use current python [maintainer approves]
Message-ID: <20020402145918.GA79399@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
References: <200203312028.g2VKS5A57918@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <200203312030.g2VKU1J95811@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200203312030.g2VKU1J95811@freefall.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next.
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I received the following mail agreeing with the patch from the
maintainer. Since it has his OK, let's apply the patch and close this
PR. Thanks.

From: Oddbjorn Steffensen <oddbjorn@tricknology.org>
To: Alan Eldridge <ports@geeksrus.net>
Subject: Re: www/pyweblib: use current python

On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 03:28:05PM -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
> The www/pyweblib port has an explicit force of
> PYTHON_VERSION=python2.1.  The package seems to build and install fine
> on current python (2.2_1), and there is no indication on the
> software's home page (last updated Feb 2002) of any incompatibility
> with 2.2.

I did this to avoid a legacy 1.6 installation I had on my machine,
but forgot to correct it prior to submitting the port. Thanks for
spotting it.


> This is one of the few (< 5) packages which specifically require 2.1,
> and I don't see a reason for that to persist.

Agreed.

-oddbjorn

-- 
AlanE
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message