From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 16 18:50:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4BF37B401; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF69F43F93; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:50:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@builder.freebsdmall.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by builder.freebsdmall.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) id h3H1oVft031874; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:50:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:50:30 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Christian Brueffer Message-ID: <20030416185030.G902@freebsdmall.com> References: <200304082353.h38NrZXM010842@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030412183216.Z43794@freebsdmall.com> <20030413145741.S28372@znfgre.tberna.bet> <20030414062201.184a0581.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030413160926.E902@freebsdmall.com> <20030414090745.134dc8a6.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030414025924.GA16894@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030414102641.GA20821@submonkey.net> <20030416233624.GE601@unixpages.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030416233624.GE601@unixpages.org>; from chris@unixpages.org on Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 01:36:24AM +0200 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: Ceri Davies cc: DougB@freebsd.org cc: cvs-doc@freebsd.org cc: brueffer@freebsd.org cc: Tom Rhodes cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org cc: blackend@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en docs.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 01:50:37 -0000 On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 01:36:24AM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote: > So the essence of the discussion is to stick with IPsec, or did I miss > something? > I'll add an entry to the wordlist then. Yes, that is what the discussion both started and ended with. - Murray