From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 13:45:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC05BAE89D for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21231849 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u74DjTgw012449 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:45:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211578] ports specifying libpcap ambiguously Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:45:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:45:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211578 Bug ID: 211578 Summary: ports specifying libpcap ambiguously Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: marino@FreeBSD.org CC: bofh@freebsd.org, dikshie@sfc.wide.ad.jp, dvl@FreeBSD.org, garga@FreeBSD.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org, jura@netams.com, koobs@FreeBSD.org, matt@peterson.org, sbz@FreeBSD.org, zi@FreeBSD.org CC: bofh@freebsd.org, dikshie@sfc.wide.ad.jp, dvl@FreeBSD.org, garga@FreeBSD.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org, jura@netams.com, koobs@FreeBSD.org, matt@peterson.org, sbz@FreeBSD.org, zi@FreeBSD.org There are currently 10 ports that have specified a library dependency on net/libpcap ambiguously. This specification is satisfied by the base libpc= ap library, so the specification has no effect. I can't tell what the port maintainer intends with regard to libpcap. If the maintainer intends to use the base libpcap, the specification should= be removed (all platforms have libpcap so specification is never satisfied). If the maintainer intends that the ports libpcap be used, it needs to be specified as "LIB_DEPENDS=3D libpcap.so.1:net/libpcap", not "LIB_DEPENDS=3D libpcap.so:net/libpcap" Can everyone here indicate their intent? Or even commit the fix to their po= rt and reference this PR number? Thanks! John net/daq (zi) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) net/hexinject (sbz) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) net/libtrace (matt@peterson.org) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) net/tcpdump (garga) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) net/xorp (hrs) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) net-mgmt/netams (jura@netams.com) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) net-mgmt/yaf (dikshie@sfc.wide.ad.jp) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) security/barnyard2 (bofh) (non-default option, mis-specified) security/py-crits (dvl) (LIB_DEPENDS, intent unclear) security/suricata (koobs) (non-default option, mis-specified) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=