Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:58:32 +1000
From:      Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Status of expl logl
Message-ID:  <20120814235832.GC33399@server.rulingia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120815070807.B3431@besplex.bde.org>
References:  <502A8CCC.5080606@missouri.edu> <20120814175257.GA69865@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120814183518.GA70092@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <502AA971.4010403@missouri.edu> <20120814195659.GA70571@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120815070807.B3431@besplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2012-Aug-15 08:15:52 +1000, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>I hardly looked at e_pow.c before.  It is apparently half about repeating
>e_log.c and e_exp.c, to get at their extra internal precision.

I expect cpow() will similarly have to copy slabs of code from e_pow.c
to avoid losing precision or domain.  Is it worth pulling some of this
"common" code out so that it can be shared amongst all the different
functions that need it?

--=20
Peter Jeremy

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlAq5igACgkQ/opHv/APuId46wCghPMSIsmybG9yPbkBaXib2iBW
O6AAn1pN52NokWGks8qs9tG6/2/csbiN
=2gzD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120814235832.GC33399>