From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Mar 10 21:03:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA26520
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 21:03:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA26512
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 21:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id XAA23523; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 23:02:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ala-ca18-14.ix.netcom.com(204.32.168.206) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma023508; Mon Mar 10 23:02:44 1997
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id VAA02508; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 21:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 21:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703110502.VAA02508@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: adam@veda.is
CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199703101306.NAA27499@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Mon, 10 Mar 1997 13:06:33 +0000 (GMT))
Subject: Re: restrictive copyright?
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Am I missing something really obvious here?

Well, sort of.  See ports/LEGAL.  It's not the GPL, it's a particular
file (ircd/res.c) that disallows redistribution.

GPL, of any version, doesn't cause any problems for ports/packages.

Satoshi