From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 11:12:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576BB16A41A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D984913C442 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-132-77.lns11.adl6.internode.on.net [121.45.132.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7LBCGRb014430 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:42:16 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Artem Kuchin" Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:42:05 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <028f01c7e37a$d8f441b0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <200708211606.00429.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <00c901c7e3d9$e6134760$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <00c901c7e3d9$e6134760$0c00a8c0@Artem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2107297.NndngpDhcW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200708212042.13616.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.312 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Martin Nilsson Subject: Re: A little story of failed raid5 (3ware 8000 series) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:12:19 -0000 --nextPart2107297.NndngpDhcW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote: > Now, what i don't understand is why Hardware_ECC_Recovered and > Seek_Error_Rate are so hight. The first one is maybe relate > to cabling problem. The driver are all in hot swap baskets of > supermicro 2u case. Maybe backpanel is no so good? > > Seek_Error_Rate is a mistety for me. Any idea? I don't know what the problem is, I would have expected the drive to=20 report errors in it's log if it is genuinely failing (I've seen this on=20 my laptop) Have you tried running SMART tests on the disk? I'm not saying SMART is the be all and end all of failure monitoring but=20 it has indicated problems to me in the past :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2107297.NndngpDhcW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGysiN5ZPcIHs/zowRAoeyAJwOzhe5HiVwAY4Bi0xhYooj160g2gCgm6tc EtimjogslakzOF4xIRBxCHc= =A8yi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2107297.NndngpDhcW--