From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 21 11:50:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB9B15376; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:50:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id UAA58650; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:50:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Doug Cc: Sheldon Hearn , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@wnm.net Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf] References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jun 1999 20:50:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: Doug's message of "Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:42:46 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug writes: > You are really really missing my point here, so I will state it > again. If you have carefully examined the code for *every* case of *every* > internal service, and you have tested it thoroughly, and you are 100% sure > that the man page is in error, change the man page. The confusion arises from the fact that inetd and /etc/services disagree on what the canonical name for the ident service is. Inetd has these canonical names hardcoded in an array of structs, so changing the canonical name in /etc/services does not affect inetd's belief of what the canonical name is. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message