From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov 23 20:53:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA27931
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA27926
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA00648; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:53:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611240453.UAA00648@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: "Jin Guojun[ITG]" <jin@george.lbl.gov>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org, swallace@ece.uci.edu
Subject: Re: Pentium Pro status 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:40:56 PST."
             <199611240440.UAA05681@george.lbl.gov> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:53:23 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Can you send me a pointer to your benchmark program?

Also are you still having problems with the 3c509?

	Tnks,
	Amancio

>From The Desk Of "Jin Guojun[ITG]" :
> > I failed to see the 2.2-alpha resulsts
> 
> I did not put it in a different place. If you saw the result before,
> you may see the different memory speed for the P6. I just replaced the
> result of 2.2-Alpha in 2.1.5 column. There is no much difference for
> CPU performence.
> 
> -Jin