From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 27 16:14:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9421C695; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe05.c2i.net [212.247.154.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A557D935; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:14:32 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50 Received: from [176.74.213.204] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop015.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 367582444; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:09:23 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Re: kern/174707: [ng_ubt] [patch] Add vendor IDs for Broadcom USB dongles (BCM20702) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:10:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-STABLE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201301200734.r0K7YH4w027535@freefall.freebsd.org> <20130120104526.GI14114@glebius.int.ru> <87k3qyojg6.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <87k3qyojg6.fsf@FreeBSD.org> X-Face: ?p&W)c(+80hU; '{.$5K+zq{oC6y| /D'an*6mw>j'f:eBsex\Gi, Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:14:33 -0000 On Sunday 27 January 2013 14:15:53 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff writes: > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 08:24:36AM -0200, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > R> glebius@FreeBSD.org writes: > > R> > > R> > Synopsis: [ng_ubt] [patch] Add vendor IDs for Broadcom USB > > R> > dongles (BCM20702) > > R> > > > R> > Responsible-Changed-From-To: glebius->rakuco > > R> > Responsible-Changed-By: glebius > > R> > Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 07:33:56 UTC 2013 > > R> > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > R> > Let Raphael handle the MFC. > > R> > > R> hselasky@ has already MFC'ed this to 9 a while ago. Do you think it is > > R> safe enough to MFC to 8 and 7? > > > > You and Hans decide. > > > > The PR can be closed since fix already reached a stable branch. > > Hans, do you think it makes sense to MFC this to the other stable > branches? I don't have 7 and 8 systems at hand to test this patch, so > I'd like your feedback on the issue. Yes, 8 at least. Could try 7 too, but then you need to translate the patch into the old USB stack. --HPS