From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 2 19:59:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA08109 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 2 May 1997 19:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA08104 for ; Fri, 2 May 1997 19:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1) id 0wNV2V-0006yB-00; Fri, 2 May 1997 20:59:11 -0600 To: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: make flags Cc: terry@lambert.org, bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net, hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 May 1997 12:50:45 +1000." <199705030250.MAA22877@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199705030250.MAA22877@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 20:59:11 -0600 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199705030250.MAA22877@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Bruce Evans writes: : >Alternatively, -j 2 could be added to the MAKE make macro, which would : >help a lot. Currently, it isn't added. However, things like -k are. : : It is added (actually to .MAKEFLAGS) but parsing of -j in .MAKEFLAGS : is broken. That would explain why my make world -j 2 test I ran didn't do any faster or slower than w/o -j 2. Warner