From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jan 23 14:24:59 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF05437B401
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB6C843F13
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:24:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 72897 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Jan 2003 22:24:58 -0000
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:24:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Test this!  Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.
In-Reply-To: <20030123134448.A57729@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0301231424040.72702-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
> Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is
> one of the crunched programs, I realised that I really needed to make
> newfs(8) use libufs.  To show off that it *can* help us reduce space,
> a good bit in some cases.

Good to see this.  Does libufs do an fsync() in bwrite() or do you need to
do that manually in place of the previous calls to wtfsflush()?

-Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message