From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 17 11: 7:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F0C37B401; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5167143E77; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:07:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.2] (vpn-client-2.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.2]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8HI4civ058512; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:04:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: ports/42870: mozilla-devel should be updated to 1.2a From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Pat Lashley Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200209171730.g8HHUQvt017995@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200209171730.g8HHUQvt017995@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 17 Sep 2002 14:07:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1032286059.331.37.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,AWL version=2.31 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 13:30, Pat Lashley wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/42870; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Pat Lashley > To: Ernst de Haan , > FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/42870: mozilla-devel should be updated to 1.2a > Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:28:27 -0700 > > --On Tuesday, September 17, 2002 03:01:09 PM +0200 Ernst de Haan > wrote: > > >> Number: 42870 > >> Category: ports > >> Synopsis: mozilla-devel should be updated to 1.2a > > That would leave us with no port for the latest Mozilla Release version. > We should have three sets of ports: > > mozilla-vendor-stable* > currently 1.0.1 > For ports/developers who need bugfixes only > > mozilla-release* > currently 1.1 > For those who want the latest stable enhancement set > > mozilla-dev* > currently 1.2a > For those who want to test alpha/beta releases or get > an early start on adapting their mozilla-dependant port > to the upcomming release. > > > Personally, I think mozilla-release deserves the 'mozilla' label; but > I know some people think that belongs to mozilla-vendor-stable. Probably > not worth arguing over... Okay, what about this: mozilla-vendor --> 1.0.x mozilla --> latest official release (1.1 now) mozilla-devel --> latest pre-release (1.2a now) Thoughts (Joe K?)? Who wants to see this? Should it happen before 4.7-REL? I just want to be done with this whole thing, but I want to make sure that if we make the change, it will stick, and will sound reasonable to the majority. Joe > > > > > -Pat > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message