From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jan 29 14:51:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C19137B400 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:51:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18820; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:51:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA02687; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:51:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14965.62448.660569.803379@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:51:28 -0700 (MST) To: "Edward Wolpert" Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Java, FreeBSD and BSDi (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I've been using jdk1.2.2p10 on my production server since it was released. > (p9 before that.) For the non-graphics work, my tests came out great. > Now, I'm getting requests for jdk1.3 in production. (I'm not doing the > linuxemulator at this point, and don't have plans for it.) I can hold off > until start of second quarter, but it doesn't seem likely that 1.3 will be > native to FreeBSD by then. I may be abit stuck... > > > A quite unpleasant situation. > > I blame Sun. I blame BSDi at this point, but I'm currently a bit bitter about what has progressed so far. No more details available, not even privately. :( Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message