From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 19 15:12:58 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0FF16A418; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF4813C458; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F5020A0; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:12:49 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EFA2089; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:12:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0650C84490; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:12:53 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Robert Watson References: <20071218120359.E15521@fledge.watson.org> <47682ED1.7000702@FreeBSD.org> <20071218204401.E33011@fledge.watson.org> <86ir2vklnm.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20071219105229.T95322@fledge.watson.org> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:12:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20071219105229.T95322@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Wed\, 19 Dec 2007 10\:53\:58 +0000 \(GMT\)") Message-ID: <86zlw6btvv.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Maxim Sobolev , current@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:12:58 -0000 Robert Watson writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Robert Watson writes: > > > I'd certainly be fine with it being added to GENERIC on our > > > various architectures. > > s/GENERIC/DEFAULTS/ > At the risk of creating a bikeshed, I thought we had a consensus that > DEFAULTS should never be used :-). What sobomax actually asked was for INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE to be opt-out; the easiest way to achieve this is to put it in DEFAULTS, so people who don't want it can use "nooption INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE". I vote in favor. It's one of those things that is so incredibly useful, but that you never remember to turn on until it's too late. BTW, it would be also useful to include the config file (if available) in the tar-formatted dumps you are working on. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no